Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Kosmochlor vs. Azurite
It's a battle of green vs blue as rare but vibrant chromium-bearing kosmochlor up against the deep blue copper alteration mineral azurite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Shi, Wenzheng, Peng, Fangle, Kongkitkul, Warat (2016) FE simulation of rate-dependent behaviours of polymer geosynthetic reinforcements for an estimation of mobilized tensile force in a reinforced soil. Computers and Geotechnics, 80. 49-58 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.06.005

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleFE simulation of rate-dependent behaviours of polymer geosynthetic reinforcements for an estimation of mobilized tensile force in a reinforced soil
JournalComputers and Geotechnics
AuthorsShi, WenzhengAuthor
Peng, FangleAuthor
Kongkitkul, WaratAuthor
Year2016 (December)Volume80
PublisherElsevier BV
DOIdoi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.06.005Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID1006846Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:1006846:9
GUID0
Full ReferenceShi, Wenzheng, Peng, Fangle, Kongkitkul, Warat (2016) FE simulation of rate-dependent behaviours of polymer geosynthetic reinforcements for an estimation of mobilized tensile force in a reinforced soil. Computers and Geotechnics, 80. 49-58 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.06.005
Plain TextShi, Wenzheng, Peng, Fangle, Kongkitkul, Warat (2016) FE simulation of rate-dependent behaviours of polymer geosynthetic reinforcements for an estimation of mobilized tensile force in a reinforced soil. Computers and Geotechnics, 80. 49-58 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.06.005
In(2016) Computers and Geotechnics Vol. 80. Elsevier BV

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Feng, Shi-Jin, Ai, Shu-Gang, Chen, H.X. (2017) Estimation of arching effect in geosynthetic-reinforced structures. Computers and Geotechnics, 87. 188-197 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.02.014
Siddiquee, Mohammed Saiful Alam, Noguchi, T., Hirakawa, D. (2015) Computational simulation of time-dependent behavior of soil–structure interaction by using a novel creep model: Application to a geosynthetic-reinforced soil physical model. Computers and Geotechnics, 66. 180-188 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.02.001
Seyedi Hosseininia, Ehsan, Ashjaee, Ahoo (2018) Numerical simulation of two-tier geosynthetic-reinforced-soil walls using two-phase approach. Computers and Geotechnics, 100. 15-29 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.04.003
Zhang, Taiyu, Zhu, Zhiwu, Ma, Yue, Cheng, Zhengqiang, Li, Tao (2025) Rate-dependent FDEM numerical simulation of dynamic tensile fracture and failure behavior in frozen soil. Computers and Geotechnics, 178. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106916
Pham, Tuan A. (2020) Analysis of geosynthetic-reinforced pile-supported embankment with soil-structure interaction models. Computers and Geotechnics, 121. 103438 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103438
Chou, Jui-Sheng, Yang, Kuo-Hsin, Pampang, Jusieandra Pribadi, Pham, Anh-Duc (2015) Evolutionary metaheuristic intelligence to simulate tensile loads in reinforcement for geosynthetic-reinforced soil structures. Computers and Geotechnics, 66. 1-15 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.01.001
Yang, Shangchuan, Leshchinsky, Ben, Zhang, Fei, Gao, Yufeng (2016) Required strength of geosynthetic in reinforced soil structures supporting spread footings in three dimensions. Computers and Geotechnics, 78. 72-87 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.04.010
Kongkitkul, Warat, Hirakawa, Daiki, Tatsuoka, Fumio (2008) Residual Deformation of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Sand in Plane Strain Compression Affected by Viscous Properties of Geosynthetic Reinforcement. Soils and Foundations, 48 (3). 333-352 doi:10.3208/sandf.48.333
Estabragh, A.R., Soltani, A., Javadi, A.A. (2016) Models for predicting the seepage velocity and seepage force in a fiber reinforced silty soil. Computers and Geotechnics, 75. 174-181 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.02.002
Zhou, An-Nan (2013) A contact angle-dependent hysteresis model for soil–water retention behaviour. Computers and Geotechnics, 49. 36-42 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.10.004
Tunsakul, Jukkrawut, Jongpradist, Pornkasem, Soparat, Preecha, Kongkitkul, Warat, Nanakorn, Pruettha (2014) Analysis of fracture propagation in a rock mass surrounding a tunnel under high internal pressure by the element-free Galerkin method. Computers and Geotechnics, 55. 78-90 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.08.003
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 9, 2025 12:32:40
Go to top of page