Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Pollucite vs. Tugtupite
It's the cesium #pollucite against the optical changeling #tugtupite for this match.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Lombard, R. J., Volpe, C. (2002) Size of Two-Body Weakly Bound Objects: Short Versus Long Range Potentials. Physical Review Letters, 88 (19). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.190402

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleSize of Two-Body Weakly Bound Objects: Short Versus Long Range Potentials
JournalPhysical Review Letters
AuthorsLombard, R. J.Author
Volpe, C.Author
Year2002 (April 25)Volume88
Issue19
PublisherAmerican Physical Society (APS)
DOIdoi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.190402Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID10585576Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:10585576:9
GUID0
Full ReferenceLombard, R. J., Volpe, C. (2002) Size of Two-Body Weakly Bound Objects: Short Versus Long Range Potentials. Physical Review Letters, 88 (19). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.190402
Plain TextLombard, R. J., Volpe, C. (2002) Size of Two-Body Weakly Bound Objects: Short Versus Long Range Potentials. Physical Review Letters, 88 (19). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.190402
In(2002, April) Physical Review Letters Vol. 88 (19) American Physical Society (APS)

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Endres, R. G., Cox, D. L., Singh, R. R. P., Pati, S. K. (2002) Mediation of Long Range Charge Transfer by Kondo Bound States. Physical Review Letters, 88 (16). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.166601
Morris, J. W., Weber, H. J. (1971) Bound-Pion Absorption byC12and Nuclear Short-Range Correlations. Physical Review Letters, 27 (19). 1299-1302 doi:10.1103/physrevlett.27.1299
Plischke, Michael, Mattis, Daniel (1971) Short-Range Versus Long-Range Order in a Model Binary Alloy. Physical Review Letters, 27 (1). 42-45 doi:10.1103/physrevlett.27.42
Roudnev, Vladimir, Cavagnero, Michael (2012) Approaching Universality in Weakly Bound Three-Body Systems. Physical Review Letters, 108 (11). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.110402
Luijten, Erik, Blöte, Henk W. J. (2002) Boundary between Long-Range and Short-Range Critical Behavior in Systems with Algebraic Interactions. Physical Review Letters, 89 (2). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.025703
Hinde, D. J., Dasgupta, M., Fulton, B. R., Morton, C. R., Wooliscroft, R. J., Berriman, A. C., Hagino, K. (2002) Fusion Suppression and Sub-Barrier Breakup of Weakly Bound Nuclei. Physical Review Letters, 89 (27). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.89.272701
Bruno, P. (2002) Long-Range Magnetic Interaction due to the Casimir Effect. Physical Review Letters, 88 (24). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.240401
Chepulskii, R. V., Tatarenko, V. A. (2002) Comment on “Strain-Induced Nonanalytic Short-Range Order in the Spin GlassCu83Mn17”. Physical Review Letters, 88 (20). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.209603
Olson Reichhardt, C. J., Reichhardt, C., Bishop, A. R. (2004) Fibrillar Templates and Soft Phases in Systems with Short-Range Dipolar and Long-Range Interactions. Physical Review Letters, 92 (1). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.92.016801
Monahan, J. E., Shakin, C. M., Thaler, R. M. (1971) Equivalent Two-Body Interactions with Specified Bound-State Wave Functions. Physical Review Letters, 27 (8). 518-519 doi:10.1103/physrevlett.27.518
Ticknor, Christopher, Rittenhouse, Seth T. (2010) Three Body Recombination of Ultracold Dipoles to Weakly Bound Dimers. Physical Review Letters, 105 (1). doi:10.1103/physrevlett.105.013201
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 8, 2025 22:46:28
Go to top of page