Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Carpathite vs. Tugtupite
Battle of mineralogical oddities as organic mineral #carpathite battles against vs #tugtupite, a mineral that looks like reindeer blood!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Consoli, N. C., Rotta, G. V., Prietto, P. D. M. (2006) Yielding–compressibility–strength relationship for an artificially cemented soil cured under stress. Géotechnique, 56 (1). 69-72 doi:10.1680/geot.2006.56.1.69

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleYielding–compressibility–strength relationship for an artificially cemented soil cured under stress
JournalGéotechnique
AuthorsConsoli, N. C.Author
Rotta, G. V.Author
Prietto, P. D. M.Author
Year2006 (February)Volume56
Issue1
PublisherThomas Telford Ltd.
DOIdoi:10.1680/geot.2006.56.1.69Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID10726633Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:10726633:4
GUID0
Full ReferenceConsoli, N. C., Rotta, G. V., Prietto, P. D. M. (2006) Yielding–compressibility–strength relationship for an artificially cemented soil cured under stress. Géotechnique, 56 (1). 69-72 doi:10.1680/geot.2006.56.1.69
Plain TextConsoli, N. C., Rotta, G. V., Prietto, P. D. M. (2006) Yielding–compressibility–strength relationship for an artificially cemented soil cured under stress. Géotechnique, 56 (1). 69-72 doi:10.1680/geot.2006.56.1.69
In(2006, February) Géotechnique Vol. 56 (1) Thomas Telford Ltd.

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Rotta, G. V., Consoli, N. C., Prietto, P. D. M., Coop, M. R., Graham, J. (2003) Isotropic yielding in an artificially cemented soil cured under stress. Géotechnique, 53 (5). 493-501 doi:10.1680/geot.2003.53.5.493
Consoli, N. C., Rotta, G. V., Prietto, P. D. M. (2000) Influence of curing under stress on the triaxial response of cemented soils. Géotechnique, 50 (1). 99-105 doi:10.1680/geot.2000.50.1.99
Consoli, N. C., Rotta, G. V., Prietto, P. D. M. (2002) Influence of curing under stress on the triaxial response of cemented soils. Géotechnique, 52 (5). 382-384 doi:10.1680/geot.52.5.382.38705
Dalla Rosa, F., Consoli, N. C., Baudet, B. A. (2008) An experimental investigation of the behaviour of artificially cemented soil cured under stress. Géotechnique, 58 (8). 675-679 doi:10.1680/geot.2008.58.8.675
CONSOLI, N.C., CRUZ, R.CABERLON, CONSOLI, B.S., MAGHOUS, S. (2012) Failure envelope of artificially cemented sand. Géotechnique, 62 (6). 543-547 doi:10.1680/geot.11.p.037
CONSOLI, N.C., FONSECA, A.V.da, SILVA, S.R., CRUZ, R.C., FONINI, A. (2012) Parameters controlling stiffness and strength of artificially cemented soils. Géotechnique, 62 (2). 177-183 doi:10.1680/geot.8.p.084
Heineck, K. S., Consoli, N. C. (2004) Discussion: Discrete framework for limit equilibrium analysis of fibre-reinforced soil. Géotechnique, 54 (1). 72-73 doi:10.1680/geot.2004.54.1.72
Consoli, N. C., Sills, G. C. (2000) Soil formation from tailings: comparison of predictions and field measurements. Géotechnique, 50 (1). 25-33 doi:10.1680/geot.2000.50.1.25
Toll, D. G., Ali Rahman, Z. (2017) Critical state shear strength of an unsaturated artificially cemented sand. Géotechnique, 67 (3). 208-215 doi:10.1680/jgeot.15.p.042
Wroth, C. P., Bassett, R. H. (1965) A Stress–Strain Relationship for the Shearing Behaviour of a Sand. Géotechnique, 15 (1). 32-56 doi:10.1680/geot.1965.15.1.32
Cabarkapa, Z. (2006) Discussion: Shear strength of cohesionless soils at low stress. Géotechnique, 56 (6). 439-441 doi:10.1680/geot.2006.56.6.439
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 20, 2025 01:58:57
Go to top of page