Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Stibnite vs. Perovskite
It's all about how minerals interact with humans as dramatic #stibnite faces off against futuristic #perovskite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Perfect, E (1999) Estimating soil mass fractal dimensions from water retention curves. Geoderma, 88 (3). 221-231 doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00128-1

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleEstimating soil mass fractal dimensions from water retention curves
JournalGeoderma
AuthorsPerfect, EAuthor
Year1999 (March)Volume88
Issue3
PublisherElsevier BV
DOIdoi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00128-1Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID12843957Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:12843957:1
GUID0
Full ReferencePerfect, E (1999) Estimating soil mass fractal dimensions from water retention curves. Geoderma, 88 (3). 221-231 doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00128-1
Plain TextPerfect, E (1999) Estimating soil mass fractal dimensions from water retention curves. Geoderma, 88 (3). 221-231 doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00128-1
In(1999, March) Geoderma Vol. 88 (3) Elsevier BV

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Comegna, Vincenzo, Damiani, Paolo, Sommella, Angelo (1998) Use of a fractal model for determining soil water retention curves. Geoderma, 85 (4). 307-323 doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00028-7
Kampichler, Christian (1999) Fractal concepts in studies of soil fauna. Geoderma, 88 (3). 283-300 doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00110-4
Perrier, Edith, Bird, Nigel, Rieu, Michel (1999) Generalizing the fractal model of soil structure: the pore–solid fractal approach. Geoderma, 88 (3). 137-164 doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00102-5
(1999) Editorial. Geoderma, 88 (3). 103-107 doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00100-1
(1999) Editorial. Geoderma, 88 (3). doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00116-5
(1999) Editorial. Geoderma, 88 (3). doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00118-9
Giménez, D., Allmaras, R.R., Huggins, D.R., Nater, E.A. (1998) Mass, surface, and fragmentation fractal dimensions of soil fragments produced by tillage. Geoderma, 86 (3). 261-278 doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00043-3
Rappoldt, Cornelis, Crawford, John W. (1999) The distribution of anoxic volume in a fractal model of soil. Geoderma, 88 (3). 329-347 doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00112-8
Mayr, T, Jarvis, N.J (1999) Pedotransfer functions to estimate soil water retention parameters for a modified Brooks–Corey type model. Geoderma, 91 (1). 1-9 doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00129-3
MillĂĄn, H., Orellana, R. (2001) Mass fractal dimensions of soil aggregates from different depths of a compacted Vertisol. Geoderma, 101 (3). 65-76 doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(00)00090-2
Taguas, F.J., Martı́n, M.A., Perfect, E. (1999) Simulation and testing of self-similar structures for soil particle-size distributions using iterated function systems. Geoderma, 88 (3). 191-203 doi:10.1016/s0016-7061(98)00104-9
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 18, 2025 09:25:43
Go to top of page