Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Calcite vs. Perovskite
This match of heavy hitters is bound to end in heartbreak as classic calcite faces off against futuristic perovskite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Prasad, Janardan (1996) A comparison between a rotavator and conventional tillage equipment for wheat-soybean rotations on a vertisol in Central India. Soil and Tillage Research, 37 (2). 191-199 doi:10.1016/0167-1987(95)00510-2

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleA comparison between a rotavator and conventional tillage equipment for wheat-soybean rotations on a vertisol in Central India
JournalSoil and Tillage Research
AuthorsPrasad, JanardanAuthor
Year1996 (June)Volume37
Issue2
PublisherElsevier BV
DOIdoi:10.1016/0167-1987(95)00510-2Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID12857562Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:12857562:0
GUID0
Full ReferencePrasad, Janardan (1996) A comparison between a rotavator and conventional tillage equipment for wheat-soybean rotations on a vertisol in Central India. Soil and Tillage Research, 37 (2). 191-199 doi:10.1016/0167-1987(95)00510-2
Plain TextPrasad, Janardan (1996) A comparison between a rotavator and conventional tillage equipment for wheat-soybean rotations on a vertisol in Central India. Soil and Tillage Research, 37 (2). 191-199 doi:10.1016/0167-1987(95)00510-2
In(1996, June) Soil and Tillage Research Vol. 37 (2) Elsevier BV

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

López, M.V., Arrúe, J.L., Sánchez-Girón, V. (1996) A comparison between seasonal changes in soil water storage and penetration resistance under conventional and conservation tillage systems in Aragón. Soil and Tillage Research, 37 (4). 251-271 doi:10.1016/0167-1987(96)01011-2
Mohanty, M, Painuli, D.K (2004) Modeling rice seedling emergence and growth under tillage and residue management in a rice–wheat system on a Vertisol in Central India. Soil and Tillage Research, 76 (2). 167-174 doi:10.1016/j.still.2003.10.001
Lal, R. (1996) Axle load and tillage effects on crop yields on a Mollic Ochraqualf in Northwest Ohio. Soil and Tillage Research, 37 (2). 143-160 doi:10.1016/0167-1987(95)01004-1
Chan, K.Y., Heenan, D.P. (1996) The influence of crop rotation on soil structure and soil physical properties under conventional tillage. Soil and Tillage Research, 37 (2). 113-125 doi:10.1016/0167-1987(96)01008-2
Mishra, J.S., Singh, V.P. (2012) Tillage and weed control effects on productivity of a dry seeded rice–wheat system on a Vertisol in Central India. Soil and Tillage Research, 123. 11-20 doi:10.1016/j.still.2012.02.003
HENDRIX, P, HAN, C, GROFFMAN, P (1988) Soil respiration in conventional and no-tillage agroecosystems under different winter cover crop rotations. Soil and Tillage Research, 12 (2). 135-148 doi:10.1016/0167-1987(88)90037-2
Oleschko, K (1996) Structure and pedofeatures of Guanajuato (Mexico) Vertisol under different cropping systems. Soil and Tillage Research, 37 (1). 15-36 doi:10.1016/0167-1987(95)00509-9
STINNER, B, HOYT, G, TODD, R (1983) Changes in soil chemical properties following a 12-year fallow: A 2-year comparison of conventional tillage and no-tillage agroecosystems. Soil and Tillage Research, 3 (3). 277-290 doi:10.1016/0167-1987(83)90028-4
Denton, H.P., Wagger, M.G. (1992) Interaction of tillage and soil type on available water in a corn-wheat-soybean rotation. Soil and Tillage Research, 23 (1). 27-39 doi:10.1016/0167-1987(92)90003-t
Thompson, J (1992) Soil biotic and biochemical factors in a long-term tillage and stubble management experiment on a vertisol. 2. Nitrogen deficiency with zero tillage and stubble retention. Soil and Tillage Research, 22 (3). 339-361 doi:10.1016/0167-1987(92)90048-g
Donald, William W. (1995) Comments on the paper ‘Wheat yield and weed population as influenced by three tillage systems on a clay soil in a temperate continental climate’. Soil and Tillage Research, 34 (2). 141-142 doi:10.1016/0167-1987(95)00460-a
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 4, 2025 11:16:35
Go to top of page