Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Topaz vs. Kyanite
It's a battle of high-pressure colourful beauties of #topaz vs #kyanite. Which can stand the heat of round 1?
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Yamakawa, Yuki (2022) Hyperelastic constitutive models for geomaterials: Extension of existing models to include finite strains and their comparison. Computers and Geotechnics, 143. 104600pp. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104600

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleHyperelastic constitutive models for geomaterials: Extension of existing models to include finite strains and their comparison
JournalComputers and Geotechnics
AuthorsYamakawa, YukiAuthor
Year2022 (March)Volume143
PublisherElsevier BV
DOIdoi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104600Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID13019332Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:13019332:4
GUID0
Full ReferenceYamakawa, Yuki (2022) Hyperelastic constitutive models for geomaterials: Extension of existing models to include finite strains and their comparison. Computers and Geotechnics, 143. 104600pp. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104600
Plain TextYamakawa, Yuki (2022) Hyperelastic constitutive models for geomaterials: Extension of existing models to include finite strains and their comparison. Computers and Geotechnics, 143. 104600pp. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104600
In(2022) Computers and Geotechnics Vol. 143. Elsevier BV

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Machaček, Jan, Nitsch, Antonia, Wichtmann, Torsten, Grandas Tavera, Carlos Eduardo (2024) Numerical modelling of expansive geomaterials: Finite element formulation and constitutive models. Computers and Geotechnics, 176. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106739
De Gennaro, V., Pereira, J.M. (2013) A viscoplastic constitutive model for unsaturated geomaterials. Computers and Geotechnics, 54. 143-151 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.06.005
Zhao, Lun-Yang, Liu, Ling-Hui, Lai, Yuan-Ming (2023) An enhanced cutting plane algorithm of elastoplastic constitutive models for geomaterials. Computers and Geotechnics, 155. 105253 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105253
Dong, Yuepeng (2023) Performance of explicit substepping integration scheme for complex constitutive models in finite element analysis. Computers and Geotechnics, 162. 105629 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105629
Jiang, Mingjing, Zhang, Fuguang, Sun, Yugang (2014) An evaluation on the degradation evolutions in three constitutive models for bonded geomaterials by DEM analyses. Computers and Geotechnics, 57. 1-16 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.12.008
Stutz, H., Mašín, D., Sattari, A.S., Wuttke, F. (2017) A general approach to model interfaces using existing soil constitutive models application to hypoplasticity. Computers and Geotechnics, 87. 115-127 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.02.010
Lei, Qinghua, Barton, Nick (2022) On the selection of joint constitutive models for geomechanics simulation of fractured rocks. Computers and Geotechnics, 145. 104707pp. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2022.104707
Qiao, Yafei, Ding, Wenqi (2017) ACMEG-TVP: A thermoviscoplastic constitutive model for geomaterials. Computers and Geotechnics, 81. 98-111 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.08.003
Suryasentana, Stephen K., Houlsby, Guy T. (2022) A Convex Modular Modelling (CMM) framework for developing thermodynamically consistent constitutive models. Computers and Geotechnics, 142. 104506pp. doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104506
Zhang, Zhenguo, Chen, Yongqiang, Huang, Zhuping (2018) A novel constitutive model for geomaterials in hyperplasticity. Computers and Geotechnics, 98. 102-113 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2018.01.017
Yildiz, Abdulazim (2009) Numerical modeling of vertical drains with advanced constitutive models. Computers and Geotechnics, 36. 1072-1083 doi:10.1016/j.compgeo.2009.04.001
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 13, 2025 18:15:52
Go to top of page