Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Cuprosklodowskite vs. Ikaite
It's radioactive #cuprosklodowskite vs ephemeral #ikaite for today's match.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Alzyoud, Kholoud, Al-Murshedi, Sadeq, England, Andrew (2023) Effective dose and image quality for different patient sizes during AP upper abdominal radiography: A phantom study. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 202. 111060 doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.111060

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleEffective dose and image quality for different patient sizes during AP upper abdominal radiography: A phantom study
JournalApplied Radiation and Isotopes
AuthorsAlzyoud, KholoudAuthor
Al-Murshedi, SadeqAuthor
England, AndrewAuthor
Year2023 (December)Volume202
PublisherElsevier BV
DOIdoi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.111060Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID16876688Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:16876688:0
GUID0
Full ReferenceAlzyoud, Kholoud, Al-Murshedi, Sadeq, England, Andrew (2023) Effective dose and image quality for different patient sizes during AP upper abdominal radiography: A phantom study. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 202. 111060 doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.111060
Plain TextAlzyoud, Kholoud, Al-Murshedi, Sadeq, England, Andrew (2023) Effective dose and image quality for different patient sizes during AP upper abdominal radiography: A phantom study. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 202. 111060 doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.111060
In(2023) Applied Radiation and Isotopes Vol. 202. Elsevier BV

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Alzyoud, Kholoud, Al-Murshedi, Sadeq, Abualkhael, Khaleda, Alqawasmeh, Farah, England, Andrew (2022) Supine and erect abdominal radiography: A comparison of radiation dose and image quality. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 190. 110477 doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110477
Hsieh, Tzuo-Yi, Chen, Sung-Lang, Chang, Yi-Ru, Tyan, Yeu-Sheng, Chen, Tou-Rong (2022) Effective dose for kidney-ureter-bladder plain radiography, intravenous urography, and abdominal computed tomography scan: A phantom study. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 187. 110339 doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110339
E, Aksit, A, Yalcin, T, Olgar (2023) Effect of varying X-ray tube voltage and additional filtration on image quality and patient dose in digital radiography system. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 199. 110893 doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2023.110893
Correa, S.C.A., Souza, E.M., Silva, A.X., Lopes, R.T., Yoriyaz, H. (2008) Dose–image quality study in digital chest radiography using Monte Carlo simulation. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 66. 1213-1217 doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.01.009
Karal, Omer, Tokgoz, Nazime (2023) Dose optimization and image quality measurement in digital abdominal radiography. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 205. 110724 doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2022.110724
Jamshidi, Mohammad Hossein, Karami, Aida, Salimi, Yazdan, Keshavarz, Amirhesam (2023) Patient effective dose and radiation biological risk in the chest and abdominopelvic computed tomography. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 193. 110628 doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110628
Pina, D.R., Duarte, S.B., Ghilardi Netto, T., Morceli, J. (2009) Phantom development for radiographic image optimization of chest, skull and pelvis examination for nonstandard patient. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 67. 61-69 doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2008.07.018
Babikir, Esameldeen, Al-Mallah, Adel, Al-Sehlawi, Mahdi, Tamam, Nissren, Sulieman, Abdelmoneim (2020) Patient radiation dose and image quality in plain radiography: An assessment of three common procedures in ten hospitals. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 173. 108888pp. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.108888
Ahmed, Nada A. (2023) Typical effective dose values from diagnostic and interventional radiology. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 192. 110611 doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110611
Leyton, Fernando, Nogueira, Maria S., Gubolino, Luiz A., Pivetta, Makyson R., Ubeda, Carlos (2016) Correlation between scatter radiation dose at height of operator's eye and dose to patient for different angiographic projections. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 117. 100-105 doi:10.1016/j.apradiso.2016.01.013
Martin, C.J, Sutton, D.G, Sharp, P.F (1999) Balancing patient dose and image quality. Applied Radiation and Isotopes, 50. 1-19 doi:10.1016/s0969-8043(98)00021-9
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 14, 2025 04:15:44
Go to top of page