Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Pollucite vs. Tugtupite
It's the cesium #pollucite against the optical changeling #tugtupite for this match.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Gill Haddow, (2010) <i>Heredity and Hope: The Case for Genetic Screening</i> (review) Technology and Culture, 51 (2) 532-533 doi:10.1353/tech.0.0443

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
Title<i>Heredity and Hope: The Case for Genetic Screening</i> (review)
JournalTechnology and Culture
AuthorsGill Haddow, Author
Year2010Volume51
Issue2
PublisherProject Muse
DOIdoi:10.1353/tech.0.0443Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID17071792Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:17071792:4
GUID0
Full ReferenceGill Haddow, (2010) <i>Heredity and Hope: The Case for Genetic Screening</i> (review) Technology and Culture, 51 (2) 532-533 doi:10.1353/tech.0.0443
Plain TextGill Haddow, (2010) <i>Heredity and Hope: The Case for Genetic Screening</i> (review) Technology and Culture, 51 (2) 532-533 doi:10.1353/tech.0.0443
In(2010) Technology and Culture Vol. 51 (2) Project Muse

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Julie Wosk, (2010) <i>Metropolis</i>. Technology and Culture, 51 (2) 403-408 doi:10.1353/tech.0.0463
Shannon Vallor, (2010) <i>Technology and Values: Essential Readings</i> (review) Technology and Culture, 51 (2) 538-540 doi:10.1353/tech.0.0468
Amy Gangloff, (2010) <i>The Automobile and American Life</i> (review) Technology and Culture, 51 (2) 517-518 doi:10.1353/tech.0.0436
David Theodore, (2010) <i>Medicine and Technology in Canada, 1900-1950</i> (review) Technology and Culture, 51 (2) 537-538 doi:10.1353/tech.0.0451
Jonathan Roberts, (2010) <i>Healing Traditions: African Medicine, Cultural Exchange, and Competition in South Africa, 1820-1948</i> (review) Technology and Culture, 51 (2) 533-535 doi:10.1353/tech.0.0445
Reed Benhamou, (2010) <i>Science and Spectacle in the European Enlightenment</i> (review) Technology and Culture, 51 (2) 493-495 doi:10.1353/tech.0.0452
Kristen M. Figg, (2010) <i>The Art, Science, and Technology of Medieval Travel</i> (review) Technology and Culture, 51 (2) 499-500 doi:10.1353/tech.0.0460
Timothy Dugdale, (2009) <i>Digital Culture</i> (review) Technology and Culture, 51 (1) 277-279 doi:10.1353/tech.0.0417
Joseph Schultz, (2010) <i>Froth! The Science of Beer</i> (review) Technology and Culture, 51 (3) 759-760 doi:10.1353/tech.2010.0000
Henry Petroski, (2010) <i>The Engineering Project: Its Nature, Ethics, and Promise</i> (review) Technology and Culture, 51 (2) 540-542 doi:10.1353/tech.0.0433
Jennifer Rampling, (2010) <i>Alchemy and Authority in the Holy Roman Empire</i> (review) Technology and Culture, 51 (2) 497-498 doi:10.1353/tech.0.0477
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are Β© OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 8, 2025 09:54:57
Go to top of page