Watch the Dallas Symposium LIVE, and fundraiser auction
Ticket proceeds support mindat.org! - click here...
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Austin, James; Crawford, Brenton (2019) Remanent magnetization mapping: A tool for greenfields magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE exploration undercover: Part 1. Ore Geology Reviews, 107. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.03.008

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleRemanent magnetization mapping: A tool for greenfields magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE exploration undercover: Part 1
JournalOre Geology Reviews
AuthorsAustin, JamesAuthor
Crawford, BrentonAuthor
Year2019 (April)Volume107
PublisherElsevier BV
DOIdoi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.03.008Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID236494Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:236494:4
GUID0
Full ReferenceAustin, James; Crawford, Brenton (2019) Remanent magnetization mapping: A tool for greenfields magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE exploration undercover: Part 1. Ore Geology Reviews, 107. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.03.008
Plain TextAustin, James; Crawford, Brenton (2019) Remanent magnetization mapping: A tool for greenfields magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE exploration undercover: Part 1. Ore Geology Reviews, 107. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.03.008
In(2019) Ore Geology Reviews Vol. 107. Elsevier BV

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Austin, James; Hillan, Dean; Foss, Clive (2019) Remanent magnetization mapping: A tool for greenfields magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE exploration undercover: Part 2. Ore Geology Reviews, 109. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.04.017
Lu, Yiguan; Lesher, C. Michael; Deng, Jun (2019) Geochemistry and genesis of magmatic Ni-Cu-(PGE) and PGE-(Cu)-(Ni) deposits in China. Ore Geology Reviews, 107. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.03.024
Makkonen, Hannu V.; Halkoaho, Tapio; Konnunaho, Jukka; Rasilainen, Kalevi; Kontinen, Asko; Eilu, Pasi (2017) Ni-(Cu-PGE) deposits in Finland – Geology and exploration potential. Ore Geology Reviews, 90. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.06.008
Barnes, Stephen J.; Cruden, Alexander R.; Arndt, Nicholas; Saumur, Benoit M. (2016) The mineral system approach applied to magmatic Ni–Cu–PGE sulphide deposits. Ore Geology Reviews, 76. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2015.06.012
Nagasingha, Lahiru M.A.; Bérubé, Charles L.; Lawley, Christopher J.M. (2024) A balanced mineral prospectivity model of Canadian magmatic Ni (± Cu ± Co ± PGE) sulphide mineral systems using conditional variational autoencoders. Ore Geology Reviews, 175. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2024.106329
Clark, Martin D.; Riller, Ulrich (2018) 3-D kinematic restoration of the eastern Sudbury Igneous Complex, Canada, and its importance for Cu-Ni-PGE sulphide exploration. Ore Geology Reviews, 101. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.07.019
Holwell, David A.; Adeyemi, Zeinab; Ward, Laura A.; Smith, Daniel J.; Graham, Shaun D.; McDonald, Iain; Smith, Jennifer W. (2017) Low temperature alteration of magmatic Ni-Cu-PGE sulfides as a source for hydrothermal Ni and PGE ores: A quantitative approach using automated mineralogy. Ore Geology Reviews, 91. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.08.025
Best, Fiona C.; Crawford, Anthony J.; Keays, Reid R.; Polito, Paul A. (2017) The geology, geochemistry and Ni-Cu-PGE potential of mafic-ultramafic bodies associated with the Dido Batholith, North Queensland, Australia. Ore Geology Reviews, 90. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.05.002
Járóka, Tom; Seifert, Thomas; Pfänder, Jörg A.; Staude, Sebastian; Seibel, Henning V.L.; Krause, Joachim; Bauer, Matthias E. (2019) Geology, sulfide mineralogy and petrogenesis of the Angstberg Ni-Cu-(PGE) sulfide mineralization (Lausitz Block, Bohemian Massif, Germany): A potential Ni-Cu exploration target in Central Europe? Ore Geology Reviews, 110. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.05.010
Lesher, C.M. (2017) Roles of xenomelts, xenoliths, xenocrysts, xenovolatiles, residues, and skarns in the genesis, transport, and localization of magmatic Fe-Ni-Cu-PGE sulfides and chromite. Ore Geology Reviews, 90. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.08.008
Neyedley, Kevin; Hanley, Jacob J.; Falck, Hendrik; Bodnar, Robert J.; Fedele, Luca; Fayek, Mostafa; Sharpe, Ryan (2019) Sulfide melt inclusions associated with magmatic Ni-Cu-platinum-group element (PGE) mineralization in the Caribou Lake Gabbro, Blatchford Lake intrusive suite, Northwest Territories, Canada. Ore Geology Reviews, 107. doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2019.02.009
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: August 15, 2025 06:55:32
Go to top of page