Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Calcite vs. Perovskite
This match of heavy hitters is bound to end in heartbreak as classic calcite faces off against futuristic perovskite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Kemežys, K. J. (1965) Significance of Punctae and Pustules in Brachiopods. Geological Magazine, 102 (4) 315-324 doi:10.1017/s0016756800053450

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleSignificance of Punctae and Pustules in Brachiopods
JournalGeological Magazine
AuthorsKemežys, K. J.Author
Year1965 (August)Volume102
Issue4
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP)
DOIdoi:10.1017/s0016756800053450Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID249531Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:249531:0
GUID0
Full ReferenceKemežys, K. J. (1965) Significance of Punctae and Pustules in Brachiopods. Geological Magazine, 102 (4) 315-324 doi:10.1017/s0016756800053450
Plain TextKemežys, K. J. (1965) Significance of Punctae and Pustules in Brachiopods. Geological Magazine, 102 (4) 315-324 doi:10.1017/s0016756800053450
In(1965, August) Geological Magazine Vol. 102 (4) Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Abstract/NotesAbstractA geometric model is proposed to explain the quincunx pattern of punctae which characterizes most terebratuloids. This model gives the two parameters d and g, which together express the density of punctae. The pattern of punctae in dalmanelloids does not differ in its basic geometry from that of the terebratuloids and can be defined by the same parameters. This also holds for the punctate spiriferoids and the punctate orthotetid genus Streptorhynchus. The pattern of pustules in the taleolate brachiopods differs from that of the model for the quincunx pattern of punctae, but can still be expressed in terms of d and g. In this case d corresponds to the wavelength of the costellae.Both punctae and pustules are morphologically and numerically related to the marginal setae.


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 4, 2025 17:28:58
Go to top of page