| Reference Type | Journal (article/letter/editorial) |
|---|
| Title | IV.—On Galerites albogalerus, Lamarck, syn. Echinoconus conicus, Breynius |
|---|
| Journal | Geological Magazine |
|---|
| Year | 1884 (January) | Series:Volume | 3:1 |
|---|
| Issue | 1 |
|---|
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
|---|
| DOI | doi:10.1017/s001675680016443x |
|---|
| Generate Citation Formats |
|---|
| Mindat Ref. ID | 261621 | Long-form Identifier | mindat:1:5:261621:0 |
|---|
|
| GUID | 0 |
|---|
| Full Reference | (1884) IV.—On Galerites albogalerus, Lamarck, syn. Echinoconus conicus, Breynius. Geological Magazine, S. 3 Vol. 1 (1) 10-18 doi:10.1017/s001675680016443x |
|---|
| Plain Text | (1884) IV.—On Galerites albogalerus, Lamarck, syn. Echinoconus conicus, Breynius. Geological Magazine, S. 3 Vol. 1 (1) 10-18 doi:10.1017/s001675680016443x |
|---|
| In | (1884, January) Geological Magazine S. 3 Vol. 1 (1) Cambridge University Press (CUP) |
|---|
| Abstract/Notes | Next to Ananchytes ovata, there is probably no fossil Echinoid which is so well known to geologists and so common in collections as Galerites albogalerus, Lam. Described by Lamarck, studied by Forbes, and puzzled over by almost every naturalist who has classified the Echinoidea, this common yet most variable form has received a number of synonyms, and has been made to belong to four genera besides that in which it now rests. |
|---|
These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.
