Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Chrysotile vs. Pectolite
Two new minerals to launch this year's cup! Hazardous (but useful!) chrysotile faces off against stunning gem pectolite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Hammer, Ø. (2009) New statistical methods for detecting point alignments. Computers & Geosciences, 35 (3) 659-666 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.03.012

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleNew statistical methods for detecting point alignments
JournalComputers & Geosciences
AuthorsHammer, Ø.Author
Year2009 (March)Volume35
Issue3
PublisherElsevier BV
DOIdoi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.03.012Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID451325Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:451325:8
GUID0
Full ReferenceHammer, Ø. (2009) New statistical methods for detecting point alignments. Computers & Geosciences, 35 (3) 659-666 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.03.012
Plain TextHammer, Ø. (2009) New statistical methods for detecting point alignments. Computers & Geosciences, 35 (3) 659-666 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.03.012
In(2009, March) Computers & Geosciences Vol. 35 (3) Elsevier BV

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Marmion, Mathieu, Hjort, Jan, Thuiller, Wilfried, Luoto, Miska (2009) Statistical consensus methods for improving predictive geomorphology maps. Computers & Geosciences, 35 (3) 615-625 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.02.024
Cartwright, Annabel, Moss, Jennifer, Cartwright, Joe (2011) New statistical methods for investigating submarine pockmarks. Computers & Geosciences, 37 (10) 1595-1601 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2011.02.013
Sonnentag, Oliver (2009) Computers & Geosciences, 35 (11) 2282 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2009.08.001
Wieland, Ralf, Dalchow, Claus (2009) Detecting landscape forms using Fourier transformation and singular value decomposition (SVD) Computers & Geosciences, 35 (7) 1409-1414 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.10.002
Jiménez, Juan J., Feito, Francisco R., Segura, Rafael J. (2009) A new hierarchical triangle-based point-in-polygon data structure. Computers & Geosciences, 35 (9) 1843-1853 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.09.013
Grunsky, Eric (2009) Computers & Geosciences, 35 (8) 1559-1562 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2009.06.001
Liu, Feng, Li, Xin (2017) New spatial upscaling methods for multi-point measurements: From normal to p-normal. Computers & Geosciences, 109. 247-257 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2017.08.001
Liu, Yuhong (2006) Using the Snesim program for multiple-point statistical simulation. Computers & Geosciences, 32 (10) 1544-1563 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2006.02.008
Dong, Pinliang (2009) Lacunarity analysis of raster datasets and 1D, 2D, and 3D point patterns. Computers & Geosciences, 35 (10) 2100-2110 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2009.04.001
Weishi, Man, Jinghuai, Gao (2009) Statistical denoising of signals in the S-transform domain. Computers & Geosciences, 35 (6) 1079-1086 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.07.003
Beran, Bora, Piasecki, Michael (2009) Engineering new paths to water data. Computers & Geosciences, 35 (4) 753-760 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2008.02.017
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2025 02:51:47
Go to top of page