Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Sanidine vs. Hematite
It's a pair of often-overlooked classics as potassium feldspar sanidine competes with iron ore hematite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Dia, Aline, Dupré, Bernard, Gariépy, Clément, Allègre, Claude J. (1990) Sm–Nd and trace-element characterization of shales from the Abitibi Belt, Labrador Trough, and Appalachian Belt: consequences for crustal evolution through time. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 27 (6) 758-766 doi:10.1139/e90-077

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleSm–Nd and trace-element characterization of shales from the Abitibi Belt, Labrador Trough, and Appalachian Belt: consequences for crustal evolution through time
JournalCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences
AuthorsDia, AlineAuthor
Dupré, BernardAuthor
Gariépy, ClémentAuthor
Allègre, Claude J.Author
Year1990 (June 1)Volume27
Issue6
PublisherCanadian Science Publishing
DOIdoi:10.1139/e90-077Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID480922Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:480922:1
GUID0
Full ReferenceDia, Aline, Dupré, Bernard, Gariépy, Clément, Allègre, Claude J. (1990) Sm–Nd and trace-element characterization of shales from the Abitibi Belt, Labrador Trough, and Appalachian Belt: consequences for crustal evolution through time. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 27 (6) 758-766 doi:10.1139/e90-077
Plain TextDia, Aline, Dupré, Bernard, Gariépy, Clément, Allègre, Claude J. (1990) Sm–Nd and trace-element characterization of shales from the Abitibi Belt, Labrador Trough, and Appalachian Belt: consequences for crustal evolution through time. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 27 (6) 758-766 doi:10.1139/e90-077
In(1990, June) Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences Vol. 27 (6) Canadian Science Publishing
Abstract/Notes Nd-isotopic compositions and Sm, Nd, Li, K, Rb, Sr, Ba, Ni, and Cr abundances are reported for 25 shale samples from the Canadian Shield (late Archean Abitibi greenstone belt and the mid-Proterozoic Labrador Trough) and from the Quebec Appalachians (lower Paleozoic Humber Zone). The chemical and isotopic characteristics of the samples are used to monitor the rate of generation and the compositional evolution of continental crust through time. The Nd crustal-residence ages record preferential time of continental growth around 2.7 and 1.7 Ga. The Nd model ages of the Appalachian shales do not record evidence for the formation of large crustal volumes through mantle extraction since 1.3 Ga. Consequently, crustal recycling was the dominant process taking place at their source areas in the Grenville Province.The trace-element distributions of shales show systematic trends as a function of time: Li, K, Ba, Sm, and Nd contents regularly increase in the post-Archean record; in comparison, the Cr and Ni contents reached a maximum towards the end of the Archean and regularly decreased thereafter. These observations could reflect two classes of processes: (a) the development of infracrustal K-rich granitoid magmatism at the expense of mantle-derived Na-rich magmatism, which dominated the Archean period; or (b) differential erosion effects, which reduced the sampling of the old, smooth crustal parts in comparison to the younger, recycled segments. In the latter case, (b), shale formation involved components whose nature and respective proportion changed after Archean time.


See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 7, 2025 23:37:47
Go to top of page