Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Calcite vs. Perovskite
This match of heavy hitters is bound to end in heartbreak as classic calcite faces off against futuristic perovskite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Wilcox, John M. (1968) Asymmetry in geomagnetic response to the polarity of the interplanetary magnetic field. Journal of Geophysical Research, 73 (21) 6835-6836 doi:10.1029/ja073i021p06835

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleAsymmetry in geomagnetic response to the polarity of the interplanetary magnetic field
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research
AuthorsWilcox, John M.Author
Year1968 (November 1)Volume73
Issue21
PublisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)
DOIdoi:10.1029/ja073i021p06835Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID777524Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:777524:0
GUID0
Full ReferenceWilcox, John M. (1968) Asymmetry in geomagnetic response to the polarity of the interplanetary magnetic field. Journal of Geophysical Research, 73 (21) 6835-6836 doi:10.1029/ja073i021p06835
Plain TextWilcox, John M. (1968) Asymmetry in geomagnetic response to the polarity of the interplanetary magnetic field. Journal of Geophysical Research, 73 (21) 6835-6836 doi:10.1029/ja073i021p06835
In(1968, November) Journal of Geophysical Research Vol. 73 (21) American Geophysical Union (AGU)

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Schatten, Kenneth H., Wilcox, John M. (1967) Response of the geomagnetic activity indexKpto the interplanetary magnetic field. Journal of Geophysical Research, 72 (21) 5185-5191 doi:10.1029/jz072i021p05185
Wilcox, John M. (1970) Statistical significance of the proposed heliographic latitude dependence of the dominant polarity of the interplanetary magnetic field. Journal of Geophysical Research, 75 (13) 2587-2590 doi:10.1029/ja075i013p02587
Wilcox, John M. (1972) Inferring the interplanetary magnetic field by observing the polar geomagnetic field. Reviews of Geophysics, 10 (4) 1003 doi:10.1029/rg010i004p01003
Maguire, John J., Carovillano, Robert L. (1968) Effect of the interplanetary field on the energy of geomagnetic disturbances. Journal of Geophysical Research, 73 (11) 3395-3405 doi:10.1029/ja073i011p03395
Rostoker, Gordon (1968) Relationship between the onset of a geomagnetic bay and the configuration of the interplanetary magnetic field. Journal of Geophysical Research, 73 (13) 4382-4387 doi:10.1029/ja073i013p04382
Wilcox, John M., Schatten, Kenneth H., Ness, Norman F. (1967) Influence of interplanetary magnetic field and plasma on geomagnetic activity during quiet-sun conditions. Journal of Geophysical Research, 72 (1) 19 doi:10.1029/jz072i001p00019
Bieber, John W. (1988) north-south asymmetry of the interplanetary magnetic field spiral. Journal of Geophysical Research, 93. 5903 doi:10.1029/ja093ia06p05903
Wilcox, John M., Scherrer, Philip H. (1972) Annual and solar-magnetic-cycle variations in the interplanetary magnetic field, 1926-1971. Journal of Geophysical Research, 77 (28) 5385-5388 doi:10.1029/ja077i028p05385
Lanzerotti, L. J. (1968) Outer-zone electrons and the interplanetary magnetic fields during two geomagnetic storms. Journal of Geophysical Research, 73 (13) 4388-4392 doi:10.1029/ja073i013p04388
Shah, G. N., Kaul, R. K., Kaul, C. L., Razdan, H., Merryfield, W. J., Wilcox, J. M. (1984) Solstitial and Hemispherical Asymmetry in the Response of Geomagnetic Field. Journal of Geophysical Research, 89. 295-300 doi:10.1029/ja089ia01p00295
Taylor, Harold E., Behannon, K. W., Ness, N. F. (1968) Measurements of the perturbed-interplanetary magnetic field in the lunar wake. Journal of Geophysical Research, 73 (21) 6723-6735 doi:10.1029/ja073i021p06723
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are Β© OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 4, 2025 01:42:26
Go to top of page