Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Taenite vs. Nontronite
It's a mineral found mostly in the farthest reaches of space vs one so common an exhaustive list of localities is nigh impossible as alloy #taenite faces off against clay #nontronite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Jonker, Rudy M, Guenther, Anja, Engqvist, Leif, Schmoll, Tim (2013) Does systematic variation improve the reproducibility of animal experiments?. Nature Methods, 10 (5). 373 doi:10.1038/nmeth.2439

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleDoes systematic variation improve the reproducibility of animal experiments?
JournalNature Methods
AuthorsJonker, Rudy MAuthor
Guenther, AnjaAuthor
Engqvist, LeifAuthor
Schmoll, TimAuthor
Year2013 (May)Volume10
Issue5
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
DOIdoi:10.1038/nmeth.2439Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID7942321Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:7942321:0
GUID0
Full ReferenceJonker, Rudy M, Guenther, Anja, Engqvist, Leif, Schmoll, Tim (2013) Does systematic variation improve the reproducibility of animal experiments?. Nature Methods, 10 (5). 373 doi:10.1038/nmeth.2439
Plain TextJonker, Rudy M, Guenther, Anja, Engqvist, Leif, Schmoll, Tim (2013) Does systematic variation improve the reproducibility of animal experiments?. Nature Methods, 10 (5). 373 doi:10.1038/nmeth.2439
In(2013, May) Nature Methods Vol. 10 (5) Springer Science and Business Media LLC

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Wolfinger, Russell D (2013) Reanalysis of Richter et al. (2010) on reproducibility. Nature Methods, 10 (5). 373-374 doi:10.1038/nmeth.2438
(2013) Enhancing reproducibility. Nature Methods, 10 (5). 367 doi:10.1038/nmeth.2471
Richter, S Helene, Garner, Joseph P, Auer, Corinna, Kunert, Joachim, Würbel, Hanno (2010) Systematic variation improves reproducibility of animal experiments. Nature Methods, 7 (3). 167-168 doi:10.1038/nmeth0310-167
Braun, Pascal (2013) Reproducibility restored—on toward the human interactome. Nature Methods, 10 (4). 301-303 doi:10.1038/nmeth.2412
Richter, S Helene, Garner, Joseph P, Würbel, Hanno (2009) Environmental standardization: cure or cause of poor reproducibility in animal experiments?. Nature Methods, 6 (4). 257-261 doi:10.1038/nmeth.1312
(2017) An assessment of SWATH reproducibility. Nature Methods, 14 (10). 943 doi:10.1038/nmeth.4446
Würbel, Hanno, Richter, S Helene, Garner, Joseph P (2013) Reply to: "Reanalysis of Richter et al. (2010) on reproducibility". Nature Methods, 10 (5). 374 doi:10.1038/nmeth.2446
Cordes, Nils, YiÄŸit, Arzu, Engqvist, Leif, Schmoll, Tim (2013) Differential sperm expenditure reveals a possible role for post-copulatory sexual selection in a lekking moth. Ecology and Evolution, 3 (3). 503-511 doi:10.1002/ece3.458
Hart, Traver, Moffat, Jason (2013) Scaling up the systematic hunt for mammalian genetic interactions. Nature Methods, 10 (5). 397-399 doi:10.1038/nmeth.2449
(2014) The measure of reproducibility. Nature Methods, 11 (9). 875 doi:10.1038/nmeth.3096
Anderson, James A, Eijkholt, Marleen, Illes, Judy (2013) Ethical reproducibility: towards transparent reporting in biomedical research. Nature Methods, 10 (9). 843-845 doi:10.1038/nmeth.2564
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 15, 2025 21:42:05
Go to top of page