Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Calcite vs. Perovskite
This match of heavy hitters is bound to end in heartbreak as classic calcite faces off against futuristic perovskite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Anderson, Robert P. (2017) When and how should biotic interactions be considered in models of species niches and distributions?. Journal of Biogeography, 44 (1). 8-17 doi:10.1111/jbi.12825

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleWhen and how should biotic interactions be considered in models of species niches and distributions?
JournalJournal of Biogeography
AuthorsAnderson, Robert P.Author
Year2017 (January)Volume44
Issue1
PublisherWiley
DOIdoi:10.1111/jbi.12825Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID8271256Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:8271256:7
GUID0
Full ReferenceAnderson, Robert P. (2017) When and how should biotic interactions be considered in models of species niches and distributions?. Journal of Biogeography, 44 (1). 8-17 doi:10.1111/jbi.12825
Plain TextAnderson, Robert P. (2017) When and how should biotic interactions be considered in models of species niches and distributions?. Journal of Biogeography, 44 (1). 8-17 doi:10.1111/jbi.12825
In(2017, January) Journal of Biogeography Vol. 44 (1) Wiley

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Soley-Guardia, Mariano, Radosavljevic, Aleksandar, Rivera, Jhanine L., Anderson, Robert P. (2014) The effect of spatially marginal localities in modelling species niches and distributions. Journal of Biogeography, 41 (7). 1390-1401 doi:10.1111/jbi.12297
Gaya, Heather E., Chandler, Richard B. (2024) Individual‐level biotic interactions and species distribution models. Journal of Biogeography, 51 (11). doi:10.1111/jbi.14972
Radosavljevic, Aleksandar, Anderson, Robert P. (2014) Making better Maxentmodels of species distributions: complexity, overfitting and evaluation. Journal of Biogeography, 41 (4). 629-643 doi:10.1111/jbi.12227
Gherghel, Iulian, Brischoux, François, PapeƟ, Monica (2018) Using biotic interactions in broad-scale estimates of species’ distributions. Journal of Biogeography, 45 (9). 2216-2225 doi:10.1111/jbi.13361
Bohl, Corentin L., Kass, Jamie M., Anderson, Robert P. (2019) A new null model approach to quantify performance and significance for ecological niche models of species distributions. Journal of Biogeography, 46 (6). 1101-1111 doi:10.1111/jbi.13573
Satler, Jordan D., Carstens, Bryan C. (2019) The Sarracenia alata pitcher plant system and obligate arthropod inquilines should be considered an evolutionary community. Journal of Biogeography, 46 (2). 485-496 doi:10.1111/jbi.13498
Matthews, Thomas J., Borges, Paulo A.V., de Azevedo, Eduardo Brito, Whittaker, Robert J. (2017) A biogeographical perspective on species abundance distributions: recent advances and opportunities for future research. Journal of Biogeography, 44 (8). 1705-1710 doi:10.1111/jbi.13008
Audusseau, HélÚne, Le Vaillant, Maryline, Janz, Niklas, Nylin, Sören, Karlsson, Bengt, Schmucki, Reto (2017) Species range expansion constrains the ecological niches of resident butterflies. Journal of Biogeography, 44 (1). 28-38 doi:10.1111/jbi.12787
(2017) Cover. Journal of Biogeography, 44 (8). doi:10.1111/jbi.13081
AragĂłn, Pedro, Carrascal, Luis M., Palomino, David (2018) Macro-spatial structure of biotic interactions in the distribution of a raptor species. Journal of Biogeography, 45 (8). 1859-1871 doi:10.1111/jbi.13389
(2017) Journal of Biogeography, 44 (8). Wiley. doi:10.1111/jbi.2017.44.issue-8
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 4, 2025 03:00:48
Go to top of page