Watch the Dallas Symposium LIVE, and fundraiser auction
Ticket proceeds support mindat.org! - click here...
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Campbell, Wallace H. (1990) Differences in geomagneticSqfield representations due to variations in spherical harmonic analysis techniques. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95. 20923 doi:10.1029/ja095ia12p20923

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleDifferences in geomagneticSqfield representations due to variations in spherical harmonic analysis techniques
JournalJournal of Geophysical Research
AuthorsCampbell, Wallace H.Author
Year1990Volume95
PublisherAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)
DOIdoi:10.1029/ja095ia12p20923Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID836245Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:836245:6
GUID0
Full ReferenceCampbell, Wallace H. (1990) Differences in geomagneticSqfield representations due to variations in spherical harmonic analysis techniques. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95. 20923 doi:10.1029/ja095ia12p20923
Plain TextCampbell, Wallace H. (1990) Differences in geomagneticSqfield representations due to variations in spherical harmonic analysis techniques. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95. 20923 doi:10.1029/ja095ia12p20923
In(1990) Journal of Geophysical Research Vol. 95. American Geophysical Union (AGU)

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Rapp, Richard H., Pavlis, Nikolaos K. (1990) The development and analysis of geopotential coefficient models to spherical harmonic degree 360. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95. 21885 doi:10.1029/jb095ib13p21885
Takeda, M. (2002) Features of global geomagneticSqfield from 1980 to 1990. Journal of Geophysical Research, 107. doi:10.1029/2001ja009210
Wu, C. S., Yoon, Peter H. (1990) Kinetic hydromagnetic instabilities due to a spherical shell distribution of pickup ions. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95. 10273 doi:10.1029/ja095ia07p10273
Campbell, Wallace H. (1976) An analysis of the spectra of geomagnetic variations having periods from 5 min to 4 hours. Journal of Geophysical Research, 81 (7) 1369-1390 doi:10.1029/ja081i007p01369
Rapp, Richard H. (1979) Reply [to “Comment on ‘The relationship between mean anomaly block sizes and spherical harmonic representations’”]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 84. 4783 doi:10.1029/jb084ib09p04783
Benkova, N. P. (1940) Spherical harmonic analysis of the Sq-variations, May-August 1933. Journal of Geophysical Research, 45 (4) 425 doi:10.1029/te045i004p00425
Chao, B. Fong, Rubincam, David Parry (1990) Variations of Mars gravitational field and rotation due to seasonal CO2exchange. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95. 14755 doi:10.1029/jb095ib09p14755
Rapp, Richard H. (1977) The relationship between mean anomaly block sizes and spherical harmonic representations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 82 (33) 5360-5364 doi:10.1029/jb082i033p05360
Campbell, Wallace H. (1982) Annual and semiannual changes of the quiet daily variations (Sq) in the geomagnetic field at North American locations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 87. 785 doi:10.1029/ja087ia02p00785
Heinemann, M., Pontius, D. H. (1990) Representations of currents and magnetic fields in isotropic magnetohydrostatic plasma. Journal of Geophysical Research, 95. 251 doi:10.1029/ja095ia01p00251
Lowes, F. J. (1979) Comment on ‘The relationship between mean anomaly block sizes and spherical harmonic representations’ by Richard H. Rapp. Journal of Geophysical Research, 84. 4781 doi:10.1029/jb084ib09p04781
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: August 20, 2025 08:46:25
Go to top of page