Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Pectolite vs. Haüyne
It's a pair of striking blue beauties as #pectolite the uncrushable faces off against #hauyne, the phoenix from volcanic ashes!
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Sandery, Paul (2018) Data assimilation cycle length and observation impact in mesoscale ocean forecasting. Geoscientific Model Development, 11. 4011-4019 doi:10.5194/gmd-11-4011-2018

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleData assimilation cycle length and observation impact in mesoscale ocean forecasting
JournalGeoscientific Model Development
AuthorsSandery, PaulAuthor
Year2018 (October 5)Volume11
PublisherCopernicus GmbH
DOIdoi:10.5194/gmd-11-4011-2018Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID8389719Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:8389719:3
GUID0
Full ReferenceSandery, Paul (2018) Data assimilation cycle length and observation impact in mesoscale ocean forecasting. Geoscientific Model Development, 11. 4011-4019 doi:10.5194/gmd-11-4011-2018
Plain TextSandery, Paul (2018) Data assimilation cycle length and observation impact in mesoscale ocean forecasting. Geoscientific Model Development, 11. 4011-4019 doi:10.5194/gmd-11-4011-2018
In(n.d.) Geoscientific Model Development Vol. 11. Copernicus GmbH

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Zheng, Tao, French, Nancy H. F., Baxter, Martin (2018) Development of the WRF-CO2 4D-Var assimilation system v1.0. Geoscientific Model Development, 11. 1725-1752 doi:10.5194/gmd-11-1725-2018
Roberts, Christopher D., Senan, Retish, Molteni, Franco, Boussetta, Souhail, Mayer, Michael, Keeley, Sarah P. E. (2018) Climate model configurations of the ECMWF Integrated Forecasting System (ECMWF-IFS cycle 43r1) for HighResMIP. Geoscientific Model Development, 11. 3681-3712 doi:10.5194/gmd-11-3681-2018
Crameri, Fabio (2018) Geodynamic diagnostics, scientific visualisation and StagLab 3.0. Geoscientific Model Development, 11. 2541-2562 doi:10.5194/gmd-11-2541-2018
Bullock Jr., Orren Russell, Foroutan, Hosein, Gilliam, Robert C., Herwehe, Jerold A. (2018) Adding four-dimensional data assimilation by analysis nudging to the Model for Prediction Across Scales – Atmosphere (version 4.0). Geoscientific Model Development, 11. 2897-2922 doi:10.5194/gmd-11-2897-2018
Kawabata, Takuya, Schwitalla, Thomas, Adachi, Ahoro, Bauer, Hans-Stefan, Wulfmeyer, Volker, Nagumo, Nobuhiro, Yamauchi, Hiroshi (2018) Observational operators for dual polarimetric radars in variational data assimilation systems (PolRad VAR v1.0). Geoscientific Model Development, 11. 2493-2501 doi:10.5194/gmd-11-2493-2018
Tereszchuk, Keith A., Rochon, Yves J., McLinden, Chris A., Vaillancourt, Paul A. (2018) Optimizing UV Index determination from broadband irradiances. Geoscientific Model Development, 11. 1093-1113 doi:10.5194/gmd-11-1093-2018
Wang, Qiang, Wekerle, Claudia, Danilov, Sergey, Wang, Xuezhu, Jung, Thomas (2018) A 4.5 km resolution Arctic Ocean simulation with the global multi-resolution model FESOM 1.4. Geoscientific Model Development, 11. 1229-1255 doi:10.5194/gmd-11-1229-2018
Sommers, Aleah, Rajaram, Harihar, Morlighem, Mathieu (2018) SHAKTI: Subglacial Hydrology and Kinetic, Transient Interactions v1.0. Geoscientific Model Development, 11. 2955-2974 doi:10.5194/gmd-11-2955-2018
Meccia, Virna Loana, Mikolajewicz, Uwe (2018) Interactive ocean bathymetry and coastlines for simulating the last deglaciation with the Max Planck Institute Earth System Model (MPI-ESM-v1.2). Geoscientific Model Development, 11. 4677-4692 doi:10.5194/gmd-11-4677-2018
Hyde, Richard, Hossaini, Ryan, Leeson, Amber A. (2018) Cluster-based analysis of multi-model climate ensembles. Geoscientific Model Development, 11. 2033-2048 doi:10.5194/gmd-11-2033-2018
Riddick, Thomas, Brovkin, Victor, Hagemann, Stefan, Mikolajewicz, Uwe (2018) Dynamic hydrological discharge modelling for coupled climate model simulations of the last glacial cycle: the MPI-DynamicHD model version 3.0. Geoscientific Model Development, 11. 4291-4316 doi:10.5194/gmd-11-4291-2018
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 17, 2025 08:50:16
Go to top of page