Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Pollucite vs. Tugtupite
It's the cesium #pollucite against the optical changeling #tugtupite for this match.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Wu, Leyuan (2018) Comparison of 3-D Fourier forward algorithms for gravity modelling of prismatic bodies with polynomial density distribution. Geophysical Journal International, 215 (3) 1865-1886 doi:10.1093/gji/ggy379

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleComparison of 3-D Fourier forward algorithms for gravity modelling of prismatic bodies with polynomial density distribution
JournalGeophysical Journal International
AuthorsWu, LeyuanAuthor
Year2018 (December 1)Volume215
Issue3
PublisherOxford University Press (OUP)
DOIdoi:10.1093/gji/ggy379Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID892017Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:892017:5
GUID0
Full ReferenceWu, Leyuan (2018) Comparison of 3-D Fourier forward algorithms for gravity modelling of prismatic bodies with polynomial density distribution. Geophysical Journal International, 215 (3) 1865-1886 doi:10.1093/gji/ggy379
Plain TextWu, Leyuan (2018) Comparison of 3-D Fourier forward algorithms for gravity modelling of prismatic bodies with polynomial density distribution. Geophysical Journal International, 215 (3) 1865-1886 doi:10.1093/gji/ggy379
In(2018, December) Geophysical Journal International Vol. 215 (3) Oxford University Press (OUP)

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Wu, Leyuan, Chen, Longwei (2016) Fourier forward modeling of vector and tensor gravity fields due to prismatic bodies with variable density contrast. Geophysics, 81 (1) doi:10.1190/geo2014-0559.1
Chen, Wenjin, Tan, Xiaolong (2024) An efficient algorithm for gravity forward modelling (GFM) with masses of arbitrary shapes and density distributions. Geophysical Journal International, 239 (3). doi:10.1093/gji/ggae343
Chen, Longwei, Liu, Lanbo (2019) Fast and accurate forward modelling of gravity field using prismatic grids. Geophysical Journal International, 216 (2) 1062-1071 doi:10.1093/gji/ggy480
Wu, Leyuan (2016) Efficient modelling of gravity effects due to topographic masses using the Gauss–FFT method. Geophysical Journal International, 205 (1) 160-178 doi:10.1093/gji/ggw010
Matsushima, Masaki (2018) Erratum: Core surface flow modelling with geomagnetic diffusion in a boundary layer. Geophysical Journal International, 215 (3) 1700 doi:10.1093/gji/ggy374
Kruglyakov, Mikhail, Kuvshinov, Alexey (2018) Using high-order polynomial basis in 3-D EM forward modeling based on volume integral equation method. Geophysical Journal International, 213 (2) 1387-1401 doi:10.1093/gji/ggy059
Watts, A B (2018) The use of object-oriented and process-oriented methods for gravity anomaly modelling of sedimentary basins. Geophysical Journal International, 215 (2) 1474-1482 doi:10.1093/gji/ggy353
Fukushima, Toshio (2018) Recursive computation of gravitational field of a right rectangular parallelepiped with density varying vertically by following an arbitrary degree polynomial. Geophysical Journal International, 215 (2) 864-879 doi:10.1093/gji/ggy317
Zhang, Yi, Mooney, Walter D, Chen, Chao (2018) Forward calculation of gravitational fields with variable resolution 3D density models using spherical triangular tessellation: Theory and Applications. Geophysical Journal International, 215 (1) 363-374 doi:10.1093/gji/ggy278
Price, M G, Davies, J H (2018) Profiling the robustness, efficiency and limits of the forward-adjoint method for 3-D mantle convection modelling. Geophysical Journal International, 212 (2) 1450-1462 doi:10.1093/gji/ggx489
Chen, Wenjin; Tan, Xiaolong; Tang, Xiaoyu (2025) A constrained Bayesian algorithm and software for 3-D density gravity inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 242 (3). doi:10.1093/gji/ggaf264
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 8, 2025 12:10:24
Go to top of page