Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Calcite vs. Perovskite
This match of heavy hitters is bound to end in heartbreak as classic calcite faces off against futuristic perovskite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Daigle, Hugh, Johnson, Andrew, Thomas, Brittney (2014) Determining fractal dimension from nuclear magnetic resonance data in rocks with internal magnetic field gradients. Geophysics, 79 (6) doi:10.1190/geo2014-0325.1

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleDetermining fractal dimension from nuclear magnetic resonance data in rocks with internal magnetic field gradients
JournalGeophysics
AuthorsDaigle, HughAuthor
Johnson, AndrewAuthor
Thomas, BrittneyAuthor
Year2014 (November)Volume79
Issue6
PublisherSociety of Exploration Geophysicists
DOIdoi:10.1190/geo2014-0325.1Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID907984Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:907984:1
GUID0
Full ReferenceDaigle, Hugh, Johnson, Andrew, Thomas, Brittney (2014) Determining fractal dimension from nuclear magnetic resonance data in rocks with internal magnetic field gradients. Geophysics, 79 (6) doi:10.1190/geo2014-0325.1
Plain TextDaigle, Hugh, Johnson, Andrew, Thomas, Brittney (2014) Determining fractal dimension from nuclear magnetic resonance data in rocks with internal magnetic field gradients. Geophysics, 79 (6) doi:10.1190/geo2014-0325.1
In(2014, November) Geophysics Vol. 79 (6) Society of Exploration Geophysicists

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Johnson, Andrew, Daigle, Hugh (2016) Nuclear magnetic resonance secular relaxation measurements as a method of extracting internal magnetic field gradients and pore sizes. Interpretation, 4. doi:10.1190/int-2015-0127.1
Zhang, Boyang, Daigle, Hugh (2017) Nuclear magnetic resonance surface relaxation mechanisms of kerogen. Geophysics, 82 (6) doi:10.1190/geo2016-0350.1
Zhang, Zeyu, Weller, Andreas (2014) Fractal dimension of pore-space geometry of an Eocene sandstone formation. Geophysics, 79 (6) doi:10.1190/geo2014-0143.1
Fay, Emily L., Knight, Rosemary J., Song, Yi-Qiao (2015) Investigating internal magnetic field gradients in aquifer sediments. Geophysics, 80 (3) doi:10.1190/geo2014-0445.1
Daigle, Hugh, Thomas, Brittney, Rowe, Harry, Nieto, Michael (2014) Nuclear magnetic resonance characterization of shallow marine sediments from the Nankai Trough, Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Expedition 333. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 119 (4) 2631-2650 doi:10.1002/2013jb010784
Grombacher, Denys, Knight, Rosemary (2015) The impact of off-resonance effects on water content estimates in surface nuclear magnetic resonance. Geophysics, 80 (6) doi:10.1190/geo2014-0402.1
Louro, Vinicius Hector Abud, Mantovani, Marta Silvia Maria, Ribeiro, Vanessa Biondo (2014) Magnetic field analysis of Morro do Leme nickel deposit. Geophysics, 79 (6) doi:10.1190/geo2014-0131.1
Hiller, Thomas, Klitzsch, Norbert (2018) Joint inversion of nuclear magnetic resonance data from partially saturated rocks using a triangular pore model. Geophysics, 83 (4) doi:10.1190/geo2017-0697.1
Salem, Ahmed, Green, Chris, Stewart, Matthew, De Lerma, Davide (2014) Inversion of gravity data with isostatic constraints. Geophysics, 79 (6) doi:10.1190/geo2014-0220.1
Zhu, Chunxiao, Daigle, Hugh, Bryant, Steven L. (2016) Paramagnetic nanoparticles as nuclear magnetic resonance contrast agents in sandstone: Importance of nanofluid-rock interactions. Interpretation, 4. doi:10.1190/int-2015-0137.1
Walbrecker, Jan O., Knight, Rosemary, Grunewald, Elliot (2014) The impact of prepolarization on Earth’s field laboratory nuclear-magnetic-resonance relaxation experiments. Geophysics, 79 (3) doi:10.1190/geo2013-0272.1
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 4, 2025 04:48:26
Go to top of page