Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Chrysotile vs. Pectolite
Two new minerals to launch this year's cup! Hazardous (but useful!) chrysotile faces off against stunning gem pectolite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Harris, Paul, Clarke, Annemarie, Juggins, Steve, Brunsdon, Chris, Charlton, Martin (2014) Geographically weighted methods and their use in network re-designs for environmental monitoring. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28 (7). 1869-1887 doi:10.1007/s00477-014-0851-1

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleGeographically weighted methods and their use in network re-designs for environmental monitoring
JournalStochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
AuthorsHarris, PaulAuthor
Clarke, AnnemarieAuthor
Juggins, SteveAuthor
Brunsdon, ChrisAuthor
Charlton, MartinAuthor
Year2014 (October)Volume28
Issue7
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
DOIdoi:10.1007/s00477-014-0851-1Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID9339920Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:9339920:1
GUID0
Full ReferenceHarris, Paul, Clarke, Annemarie, Juggins, Steve, Brunsdon, Chris, Charlton, Martin (2014) Geographically weighted methods and their use in network re-designs for environmental monitoring. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28 (7). 1869-1887 doi:10.1007/s00477-014-0851-1
Plain TextHarris, Paul, Clarke, Annemarie, Juggins, Steve, Brunsdon, Chris, Charlton, Martin (2014) Geographically weighted methods and their use in network re-designs for environmental monitoring. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28 (7). 1869-1887 doi:10.1007/s00477-014-0851-1
In(2014, October) Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Vol. 28 (7) Springer Science and Business Media LLC

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Harris, Paul, Brunsdon, Chris, Charlton, Martin, Juggins, Steve, Clarke, Annemarie (2014) Multivariate Spatial Outlier Detection Using Robust Geographically Weighted Methods. Mathematical Geosciences, 46 (1). 1-31 doi:10.1007/s11004-013-9491-0
Harris, Paul, Clarke, Annemarie, Juggins, Steve, Brunsdon, Chris, Charlton, Martin (2015) Enhancements to a Geographically Weighted Principal Component Analysis in the Context of an Application to an Environmental Data Set. Geographical Analysis, 47 (2). 146-172 doi:10.1111/gean.12048
Harris, Paul, Charlton, Martin, Fotheringham, A. Stewart (2010) Moving window kriging with geographically weighted variograms. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 24 (8). 1193-1209 doi:10.1007/s00477-010-0391-2
Harris, Paul, Brunsdon, Chris, Fotheringham, A. Stewart (2011) Links, comparisons and extensions of the geographically weighted regression model when used as a spatial predictor. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 25 (2). 123-138 doi:10.1007/s00477-010-0444-6
Lu, Binbin, Harris, Paul, Charlton, Martin, Brunsdon, Chris (2015) Calibrating a Geographically Weighted Regression Model with Parameter-specific Distance Metrics. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 26. 109-114 doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2015.05.011
Harris, Paul, Brunsdon, Chris, Charlton, Martin (2011) Geographically weighted principal components analysis. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 25 (10). 1717-1736 doi:10.1080/13658816.2011.554838
Lu, Binbin, Harris, Paul, Charlton, Martin, Brunsdon, Chris (2014) The GWmodel R package: further topics for exploring spatial heterogeneity using geographically weighted models. Geo-spatial Information Science, 17. 85-101 doi:10.1080/10095020.2014.917453
Lu, Binbin, Brunsdon, Chris, Charlton, Martin, Harris, Paul (2017) Geographically weighted regression with parameter-specific distance metrics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 31 (5). 982-998 doi:10.1080/13658816.2016.1263731
Lu, Binbin, Charlton, Martin, Brunsdon, Chris, Harris, Paul (2016) The Minkowski approach for choosing the distance metric in geographically weighted regression. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 30 (2). 351-368 doi:10.1080/13658816.2015.1087001
Kim, Yoomi, Tanaka, Katsuya, Ge, Chazhong (2018) Estimating the provincial environmental Kuznets curve in China: a geographically weighted regression approach. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 32 (7). 2147-2163 doi:10.1007/s00477-017-1503-z
Lu, Binbin, Brunsdon, Chris, Charlton, Martin, Harris, Paul (2019) A response to ‘A comment on geographically weighted regression with parameter-specific distance metrics’. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 33 (7). 1300-1312 doi:10.1080/13658816.2019.1585541
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 1, 2025 07:47:49
Go to top of page