Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Sanidine vs. Hematite
It's a pair of often-overlooked classics as potassium feldspar sanidine competes with iron ore hematite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Wilkinson, Rorden (2015) Changing power relations in the WTO – Why the India–U.S. trade agreement should make us worry more, rather than less, about global trade governance. Geoforum, 61. 13-16 doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.02.007

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleChanging power relations in the WTO – Why the India–U.S. trade agreement should make us worry more, rather than less, about global trade governance
JournalGeoforum
AuthorsWilkinson, RordenAuthor
Year2015 (May)Volume61
PublisherElsevier BV
DOIdoi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.02.007Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID987054Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:987054:7
GUID0
Full ReferenceWilkinson, Rorden (2015) Changing power relations in the WTO – Why the India–U.S. trade agreement should make us worry more, rather than less, about global trade governance. Geoforum, 61. 13-16 doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.02.007
Plain TextWilkinson, Rorden (2015) Changing power relations in the WTO – Why the India–U.S. trade agreement should make us worry more, rather than less, about global trade governance. Geoforum, 61. 13-16 doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.02.007
In(2015) Geoforum Vol. 61. Elsevier BV

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Kazzi, Habib (2019) Why a U.S.-China Trade Deal will not Ensure an Effective Global Trade Governance. European Scientific Journal ESJ, 15. doi:10.19044/esj.2019.v15n16p191
Birch, Hillary (2025) More than ‘self-help’: The urban governance of the Ebola outbreak in Monrovia, Liberia. Geoforum, 161. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104250
Doherty, Bob, Smith, Alastair, Parker, Sara (2015) Fair Trade market creation and marketing in the Global South. Geoforum, 67. 158-171 doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.04.015
ROOTH, TIM (2012) Power and the governance of global trade: from the GATT to the WTO - By Soo Yeon Kim. The Economic History Review, 65 (1). 412-413 doi:10.1111/j.1468-0289.2011.00622_29.x
McCarthy, James (2004) Privatizing conditions of production: trade agreements as neoliberal environmental governance. Geoforum, 35 (3) 327-341 doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2003.07.002
Azmeh, Shamel (2014) Trade regimes and global production networks. Geoforum, 57. 57-66 doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.08.012
Smith, Alastair M. (2013) Fair trade governance and diversification: The experience of the National Smallholder Farmers’ Association of Malawi. Geoforum, 48. 114-125 doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.04.020
Brooks, Andrew (2013) Stretching global production networks: The international second-hand clothing trade. Geoforum, 44. 10-22 doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.06.004
Hardaker, Sina (2025) Platformizing structural policy instruments? Fostering (infrastructural) power in the context of Digital Free Trade Zones. Geoforum, 160. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104218
Krähmer, Karl (2025) Degrowth in global spaces: Extractivism and practices of socio-ecological transformation in the geography of Chile’s global fruit trade. Geoforum, 160. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2025.104230
Jones, Caitlin (2023) Tortoises to acres: The relationships and movements of property and more-than-human species in road governance processes. Geoforum, 147. 103882 doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2023.103882
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 7, 2025 14:29:48
Go to top of page