Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Kosmochlor vs. Azurite
It's a battle of green vs blue as rare but vibrant chromium-bearing kosmochlor up against the deep blue copper alteration mineral azurite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

An, Yulin, Huang, Jinming, Chen, Yudong (2004) Forward computation of the magnetic field of a 3D body with arbitrary boundary and continually varying magnetization. Geophysical Prospecting, 52 (1) 49-63 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00399.x

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleForward computation of the magnetic field of a 3D body with arbitrary boundary and continually varying magnetization
JournalGeophysical Prospecting
AuthorsAn, YulinAuthor
Huang, JinmingAuthor
Chen, YudongAuthor
Year2004 (January)Volume52
Issue1
PublisherWiley
DOIdoi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00399.xSearch in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID990511Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:990511:9
GUID0
Full ReferenceAn, Yulin, Huang, Jinming, Chen, Yudong (2004) Forward computation of the magnetic field of a 3D body with arbitrary boundary and continually varying magnetization. Geophysical Prospecting, 52 (1) 49-63 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00399.x
Plain TextAn, Yulin, Huang, Jinming, Chen, Yudong (2004) Forward computation of the magnetic field of a 3D body with arbitrary boundary and continually varying magnetization. Geophysical Prospecting, 52 (1) 49-63 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00399.x
In(2004, January) Geophysical Prospecting Vol. 52 (1) Wiley

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

RUOTOISTENMAKI, TAPIO (1993) THE MAGNETIC ANOMALY OF 3D SOURCES HAVING ARBITRARY GEOMETRY AND MAGNETIZATION. Geophysical Prospecting, 41 (4) 413-433 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1993.tb00577.x
Moucha, Robert, Bailey, Richard C. (2004) An accurate and robust multigrid algorithm for 2D forward resistivity modelling. Geophysical Prospecting, 52 (3) 197-212 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00411.x
Duveneck, E. (2004) 3D tomographic velocity model estimation with kinematic wavefield attributes. Geophysical Prospecting, 52 (6) 535-545 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00449.x
OKABE, M. (1981) BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD FOR THE ARBITRARY INHOMOGENEITIES PROBLEM IN ELECTRICAL PROSPECTING*. Geophysical Prospecting, 29 (1) 39-59 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1981.tb01010.x
Buske, S., Kastner, U. (2004) Efficient and accurate computation of seismic traveltimes and amplitudes. Geophysical Prospecting, 52 (4) 313-322 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00417.x
HVOZDARA, M. (1993) ON THE COMPUTATION OF THE MAGNETIC FIELD DUE TO A D.C. POINT ELECTRODE AT THE VERTICAL BOUNDARY BETWEEN TWO QUARTER-SPACES1. Geophysical Prospecting, 41 (6) 767-778 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1993.tb00883.x
Tegtmeier, S., Gisolf, A., Verschuur, D.J. (2004) 3D sparse-data Kirchhoff redatuming. Geophysical Prospecting, 52 (6) 509-521 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00443.x
Levin, Stewart A. (2004) DeltaxneDeltay in 3D depth migration via McClellan transformations. Geophysical Prospecting, 52 (3) 241-246 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00409.x
GREEN, R. (1960) REMANENT MAGNETIZATION AND THE INTERPRETATION OF MAGNETIC ANOMALIES. Geophysical Prospecting, 8 (1) 98-110 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1960.tb01489.x
Ivan, M. (1996) Optimum expression for computation of the magnetic field of a homogeneous polyhedral body12. Geophysical Prospecting, 44 (2) 279-288 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1996.tb00150.x
Pohánka, V. (1998) Optimum expression for computation of the gravity field of a polyhedral body with linearly increasing density. Geophysical Prospecting, 46 (4) 391-404 doi:10.1046/j.1365-2478.1998.960335.x
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 9, 2025 22:22:28
Go to top of page