Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Silver vs. Baryte
Are you ready for beautiful utility as sparkling silver competes against hefty baryte?
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Tompkins, Michael J., Fernández Martínez, Juan Luis, Fernández Muñiz, Zulima (2013) Comparison of sparse-grid geometric and random sampling methods in nonlinear inverse solution uncertainty estimation. Geophysical Prospecting, 61 (1) 28-41 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01057.x

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleComparison of sparse-grid geometric and random sampling methods in nonlinear inverse solution uncertainty estimation
JournalGeophysical Prospecting
AuthorsTompkins, Michael J.Author
Fernández Martínez, Juan LuisAuthor
Fernández Muñiz, ZulimaAuthor
Year2013 (January)Volume61
Issue1
PublisherWiley
DOIdoi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01057.xSearch in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID991271Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:991271:1
GUID0
Full ReferenceTompkins, Michael J., Fernández Martínez, Juan Luis, Fernández Muñiz, Zulima (2013) Comparison of sparse-grid geometric and random sampling methods in nonlinear inverse solution uncertainty estimation. Geophysical Prospecting, 61 (1) 28-41 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01057.x
Plain TextTompkins, Michael J., Fernández Martínez, Juan Luis, Fernández Muñiz, Zulima (2013) Comparison of sparse-grid geometric and random sampling methods in nonlinear inverse solution uncertainty estimation. Geophysical Prospecting, 61 (1) 28-41 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01057.x
In(2013, January) Geophysical Prospecting Vol. 61 (1) Wiley

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Fernández Martínez, Juan L., Fernández Muñiz, M. Zulima, Tompkins, Michael J. (2012) On the topography of the cost functional in linear and nonlinear inverse problems. Geophysics, 77 (1) doi:10.1190/geo2011-0341.1
Azevedo, Leonardo, Tompkins, Michael J., Mukerji, Tapan (2016) Regularized sparse-grid geometric sampling for uncertainty analysis in non-linear inverse problems. Geophysical Prospecting, 64 (2) 320-334 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12286
Fernández-Martínez, Juan Luis, Xu, Shan, Sirieix, Colette, Fernández-Muniz, Zulima, Riss, Joëlle (2017) Uncertainty analysis and probabilistic segmentation of electrical resistivity images: the 2D inverse problem. Geophysical Prospecting, 65. 112-130 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12559
Tompkins, Michael J., Fernández Martínez, Juan L., Alumbaugh, David L., Mukerji, Tapan (2011) Scalable uncertainty estimation for nonlinear inverse problems using parameter reduction, constraint mapping, and geometric sampling: Marine controlled-source electromagnetic examples. Geophysics, 76 (4) doi:10.1190/1.3581355
Fernández-Martínez, Juan Luis, Fernández-Muñiz, Zulima, Xu, Shan, Cernea, Ana, Sirieix, Colette, Riss, Joëlle (2019) Efficient uncertainty analysis of the 3D electrical tomography inverse problem. Geophysics, 84 (3) doi:10.1190/geo2017-0729.1
Fernández-Muñiz, Zulima, Khaniani, Hassan, Fernández-Martínez, Juan Luis (2019) Data kit inversion and uncertainty analysis. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 161. 228-238 doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2018.12.022
Fernández-Martínez, Juan L., Fernández-Muñiz, Zulima (2020) The curse of dimensionality in inverse problems. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 369. 112571pp. doi:10.1016/j.cam.2019.112571
Fernández-Martínez, J.L., Fernández-Muñiz, Z., Pallero, J.L.G., Bonvalot, S. (2017) Linear geophysical inversion via the discrete cosine pseudo-inverse: application to potential fields. Geophysical Prospecting, 65. 94-111 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12548
Fernández-Muñiz, Zulima, Fernández-Martínez, Juan L., Srinivasan, Sanjay, Mukerji, Tapan (2015) Comparative analysis of the solution of linear continuous inverse problems using different basis expansions. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 113. 92-102 doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2014.12.010
Pallero, José, Fernández-Muñiz, María, Cernea, Ana, Álvarez-Machancoses, Óscar, Pedruelo-González, Luis, Bonvalot, Sylvain, Fernández-Martínez, Juan (2018) Particle Swarm Optimization and Uncertainty Assessment in Inverse Problems. Entropy, 20 (2). 96pp. doi:10.3390/e20020096
Fernández-Muñiz, M.Z., Cernea, A., Fernández-Martínez, J.L. (2017) Linear inversion via the discrete wavelet transform pseudoinverse. Geophysical Prospecting, 65. 131-149 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12595
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 5, 2025 09:30:45
Go to top of page