Vote for your favorite mineral in #MinCup25! - Stibnite vs. Okenite
It's a battle of dark and light as soft, dramatic stibnite goes up against adorable cottonballs of Okenite.
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Luu, Keurfon, Noble, Mark, Gesret, Alexandrine, Thierry, Philippe (2020) Towards large‐scale stochastic refraction tomography: a comparison of three evolutionary algorithms. Geophysical Prospecting, 68 (2) 536-552 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12866

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleTowards large‐scale stochastic refraction tomography: a comparison of three evolutionary algorithms
JournalGeophysical Prospecting
AuthorsLuu, KeurfonAuthor
Noble, MarkAuthor
Gesret, AlexandrineAuthor
Thierry, PhilippeAuthor
Year2020 (February)Volume68
Issue2
PublisherWiley
DOIdoi:10.1111/1365-2478.12866Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID992258Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:992258:1
GUID0
Full ReferenceLuu, Keurfon, Noble, Mark, Gesret, Alexandrine, Thierry, Philippe (2020) Towards large‐scale stochastic refraction tomography: a comparison of three evolutionary algorithms. Geophysical Prospecting, 68 (2) 536-552 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12866
Plain TextLuu, Keurfon, Noble, Mark, Gesret, Alexandrine, Thierry, Philippe (2020) Towards large‐scale stochastic refraction tomography: a comparison of three evolutionary algorithms. Geophysical Prospecting, 68 (2) 536-552 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12866
In(2020, February) Geophysical Prospecting Vol. 68 (2) Wiley

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Luu, Keurfon, Noble, Mark, Gesret, Alexandrine, Belayouni, Nidhal, Roux, Pierre-François (2018) A parallel competitive Particle Swarm Optimization for non-linear first arrival traveltime tomography and uncertainty quantification. Computers & Geosciences, 113. 81-93 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2018.01.016
Bottero, Alexis, Gesret, Alexandrine, Romary, Thomas, Noble, Mark, Maisons, Christophe (2016) Stochastic seismic tomography by interacting Markov chains. Geophysical Journal International, 207 (1) 374-392 doi:10.1093/gji/ggw272
Begat, Soazig Le, Chauris, Herve, Devaux, Vincent, Nguyen, Sylvain, Noble, Mark (2004) Velocity model estimation for depth imaging: Comparison of three tomography methods on a 2D real data set. Geophysical Prospecting, 52 (5) 427-438 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2004.00427.x
Loke, M.H., Papadopoulos, N., Wilkinson, P.B., Oikonomou, D., Simyrdanis, K., Rucker, D.F. (2020) The inversion of data from very large three‐dimensional electrical resistivity tomography mobile surveys. Geophysical Prospecting, 68 (8) 2579-2597 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.13008
(2020) Erratum. Geophysical Prospecting, 68 (2) 732 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12925
(2020) Issue Information. Geophysical Prospecting, 68 (2) 351-352 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12813
Belayouni, Nidhal, Gesret, Alexandrine, Daniel, Guillaume, Noble, Mark (2015) Microseismic event location using the first and reflected arrivals. Geophysics, 80 (6) doi:10.1190/geo2015-0068.1
(2020) Erratum. Geophysical Prospecting, 68 (7) 2343 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.13000
Di, Haibin, AlRegib, Ghassan (2020) A comparison of seismic saltbody interpretation via neural networks at sample and pattern levels. Geophysical Prospecting, 68 (2) 521-535 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12865
(2020) Issue Information. Geophysical Prospecting, 68 (1) 1 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12812
Qiao, Baoping, Guo, Ping, Wang, Pu, Hu, Tianyue (2015) Retrieval of super-virtual refraction by cross-correlation. Geophysical Prospecting, 63 (3) 552-566 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12202
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: September 2, 2025 20:30:03
Go to top of page