Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Pašteka, R., Richter, F.P., Karcol, R., Brazda, K., Hajach, M. (2009) Regularized derivatives of potential fields and their role in semi-automated interpretation methods. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 507-516 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00780.x

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleRegularized derivatives of potential fields and their role in semi-automated interpretation methods
JournalGeophysical Prospecting
AuthorsPašteka, R.Author
Richter, F.P.Author
Karcol, R.Author
Brazda, K.Author
Hajach, M.Author
Year2009 (July)Volume57
Issue4
PublisherWiley
DOIdoi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00780.xSearch in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID990911Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:990911:7
GUID0
Full ReferencePašteka, R., Richter, F.P., Karcol, R., Brazda, K., Hajach, M. (2009) Regularized derivatives of potential fields and their role in semi-automated interpretation methods. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 507-516 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00780.x
Plain TextPašteka, R., Richter, F.P., Karcol, R., Brazda, K., Hajach, M. (2009) Regularized derivatives of potential fields and their role in semi-automated interpretation methods. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 507-516 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00780.x
In(2009, July) Geophysical Prospecting Vol. 57 (4) Wiley

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Elysseieva, I.S., Pašteka, R. (2009) Direct interpretation of 2D potential fields for deep structures by means of the quasi-singular points method. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 683-705 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00806.x
Karcol, Roland, Pašteka, Roman (2017) Density function evaluation from borehole gravity meter data - regularized spectral domain deconvolution approach. Geophysical Prospecting, 65 (1) 365-378 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12427
Sailhac, P., Gibert, D., Boukerbout, H. (2009) The theory of the continuous wavelet transform in the interpretation of potential fields: a review. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 517-525 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00794.x
Karcol, Roland, Pašteka, Roman (2020) The combination of the regularized operators for horizontal/vertical differentiation and downward continuation in potential fields interpretation. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 182. 104188pp. doi:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2020.104188
Zhdanov, Michael S. (2009) New advances in regularized inversion of gravity and electromagnetic data. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 463-478 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00763.x
Cooper, Gordon R. J. (2023) A generalized source‐distance semi‐automatic interpretation method for potential field data. Geophysical Prospecting, 71 (4) 713-721 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.13346
Karcol, Roland, Pašteka, Roman (2025) Regularized derivatives — Revisited. GEOPHYSICS, 90 (3). doi:10.1190/geo2023-0787.1
Cella, Federico, Fedi, Maurizio, Florio, Giovanni (2009) Toward a full multiscale approach to interpret potential fields. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 543-557 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00808.x
(2009) Introduction. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 461-462 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00816.x
Elysseieva, I.S., Pašteka, R. (2019) Review Paper: Historical development of the total normalized gradient method in profile gravity field interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting, 67 (1) 188-209 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12704
Beamish, David (2012) The application of spatial derivatives to non-potential field data interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting, 60 (2) 337-360 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.00976.x
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: August 31, 2025 17:50:30
Go to top of page