Watch the Dallas Symposium LIVE, and fundraiser auction
Ticket proceeds support mindat.org! - click here...
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Elysseieva, I.S., Pašteka, R. (2009) Direct interpretation of 2D potential fields for deep structures by means of the quasi-singular points method. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 683-705 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00806.x

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleDirect interpretation of 2D potential fields for deep structures by means of the quasi-singular points method
JournalGeophysical Prospecting
AuthorsElysseieva, I.S.Author
Pašteka, R.Author
Year2009 (July)Volume57
Issue4
PublisherWiley
DOIdoi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00806.xSearch in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID990919Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:990919:3
GUID0
Full ReferenceElysseieva, I.S., Pašteka, R. (2009) Direct interpretation of 2D potential fields for deep structures by means of the quasi-singular points method. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 683-705 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00806.x
Plain TextElysseieva, I.S., Pašteka, R. (2009) Direct interpretation of 2D potential fields for deep structures by means of the quasi-singular points method. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 683-705 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00806.x
In(2009, July) Geophysical Prospecting Vol. 57 (4) Wiley

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Elysseieva, I.S., Pašteka, R. (2019) Review Paper: Historical development of the total normalized gradient method in profile gravity field interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting, 67 (1) 188-209 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12704
CIANCIARA, B., MARCAK, H. (1979) GEOPHYSICAL ANOMALY INTERPRETATION OF POTENTIAL FIELDS BY MEANS OF SINGULAR POINTS METHOD AND FILTERING*. Geophysical Prospecting, 27 (1) 251-260 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1979.tb00969.x
Pašteka, R., Richter, F.P., Karcol, R., Brazda, K., Hajach, M. (2009) Regularized derivatives of potential fields and their role in semi-automated interpretation methods. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 507-516 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00780.x
Sailhac, P., Gibert, D., Boukerbout, H. (2009) The theory of the continuous wavelet transform in the interpretation of potential fields: a review. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 517-525 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00794.x
Florio, G., Fedi, M., Rapolla, A. (2009) Interpretation of regional aeromagnetic data by the scaling function method: the case of Southern Apennines (Italy) Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 479-489 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00807.x
de Nardis, R., Cardarelli, E., Dobroka, M. (2005) Quasi-2D hybrid joint inversion of seismic and geoelectric data. Geophysical Prospecting, 53 (5) 705-716 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2005.00497.x
Cella, Federico, Fedi, Maurizio, Florio, Giovanni (2009) Toward a full multiscale approach to interpret potential fields. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 543-557 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00808.x
LEE, T. (1972) A GENERAL TECHNIQUE FOR THE DIRECT INTERPRETATION OF RESISTIVITY DATA OVER TWO-DIMENSIONAL STRUCTURES*. Geophysical Prospecting, 20 (4) 847-859 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1972.tb00670.x
SYBERG, F. J. R. (1972) A FOURIER METHOD FOR THE REGIONAL-RESIDUAL PROBLEM OF POTENTIAL FIELDS*. Geophysical Prospecting, 20 (1) 47-75 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1972.tb00619.x
(2009) Introduction. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 461-462 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00816.x
Cooper, Gordon R. J. (2023) A generalized source‐distance semi‐automatic interpretation method for potential field data. Geophysical Prospecting, 71 (4) 713-721 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.13346
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: August 21, 2025 06:28:34
Go to top of page