Watch the Dallas Symposium LIVE, and fundraiser auction
Ticket proceeds support mindat.org! - click here...
Log InRegister
Quick Links : The Mindat ManualThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryMindat Newsletter [Free Download]
Home PageAbout MindatThe Mindat ManualHistory of MindatCopyright StatusWho We AreContact UsAdvertise on Mindat
Donate to MindatCorporate SponsorshipSponsor a PageSponsored PagesMindat AdvertisersAdvertise on Mindat
Learning CenterWhat is a mineral?The most common minerals on earthInformation for EducatorsMindat ArticlesThe ElementsThe Rock H. Currier Digital LibraryGeologic Time
Minerals by PropertiesMinerals by ChemistryAdvanced Locality SearchRandom MineralRandom LocalitySearch by minIDLocalities Near MeSearch ArticlesSearch GlossaryMore Search Options
Search For:
Mineral Name:
Locality Name:
Keyword(s):
 
The Mindat ManualAdd a New PhotoRate PhotosLocality Edit ReportCoordinate Completion ReportAdd Glossary Item
Mining CompaniesStatisticsUsersMineral MuseumsClubs & OrganizationsMineral Shows & EventsThe Mindat DirectoryDevice SettingsThe Mineral Quiz
Photo SearchPhoto GalleriesSearch by ColorNew Photos TodayNew Photos YesterdayMembers' Photo GalleriesPast Photo of the Day GalleryPhotography

Elysseieva, I.S., Pašteka, R. (2019) Review Paper: Historical development of the total normalized gradient method in profile gravity field interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting, 67 (1) 188-209 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12704

Advanced
   -   Only viewable:
Reference TypeJournal (article/letter/editorial)
TitleReview Paper: Historical development of the total normalized gradient method in profile gravity field interpretation
JournalGeophysical Prospecting
AuthorsElysseieva, I.S.Author
Pašteka, R.Author
Year2019 (January)Volume67
Issue1
PublisherWiley
DOIdoi:10.1111/1365-2478.12704Search in ResearchGate
Generate Citation Formats
Mindat Ref. ID992044Long-form Identifiermindat:1:5:992044:0
GUID0
Full ReferenceElysseieva, I.S., Pašteka, R. (2019) Review Paper: Historical development of the total normalized gradient method in profile gravity field interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting, 67 (1) 188-209 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12704
Plain TextElysseieva, I.S., Pašteka, R. (2019) Review Paper: Historical development of the total normalized gradient method in profile gravity field interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting, 67 (1) 188-209 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12704
In(2019, January) Geophysical Prospecting Vol. 67 (1) Wiley

See Also

These are possibly similar items as determined by title/reference text matching only.

Elysseieva, I.S., Pašteka, R. (2009) Direct interpretation of 2D potential fields for deep structures by means of the quasi-singular points method. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 683-705 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00806.x
Cooper, G.R.J. (2012) A gradient-ratio method for the semi-automatic interpretation of gravity map data sets. Geophysical Prospecting, 60 (5) 995-1000 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2011.01031.x
Beiki, Majid, Keating, Pierre, Clark, David A. (2014) Interpretation of magnetic and gravity gradient tensor data using normalized source strength - A case study from McFaulds Lake, Northern Ontario, Canada. Geophysical Prospecting, 62 (5) 1180-1192 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12115
Alipour, Ako, Motaghi, Khalil, Mousavi, Zahra, Cheraghi, Hamideh, Saadat, Seyed Abdoreza (2024) Adopting normalized full gradient method for regional‐scale gravity modelling: A case study for Northwestern Iran. Geophysical Prospecting, 72 (2) 833-856 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.13433
Karcol, Roland, Pašteka, Roman (2017) Density function evaluation from borehole gravity meter data - regularized spectral domain deconvolution approach. Geophysical Prospecting, 65 (1) 365-378 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12427
ROSENBACH, OTTO (1954) QUANTITATIVE STUDIES CONCERNING THE VERTICAL GRADIENT AND SECOND DERIVATIVE METHODS OF GRAVITY INTERPRETATION*. Geophysical Prospecting, 2 (2) 128-138 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1954.tb01282.x
Pašteka, R., Richter, F.P., Karcol, R., Brazda, K., Hajach, M. (2009) Regularized derivatives of potential fields and their role in semi-automated interpretation methods. Geophysical Prospecting, 57 (4) 507-516 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2008.00780.x
WEELDEN, A. (1953) ON THE INTERPRETATION OF GRAVITY DATA*. Geophysical Prospecting, 1 (2) 75-81 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1953.tb01133.x
Barnes, G.J. (2019) The Gravity Module Assembly used in airborne full tensor gradiometry surveys. Geophysical Prospecting, 67 (6) 1620-1625 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12707
(2019) Issue Information. Geophysical Prospecting, 67 (1) 1-2 doi:10.1111/1365-2478.12655
ROSENBACH, OTTO, KOEHLER, R., WIRTH, E. (1954) A COMPARISON OF THE SECOND DERIVATIVE METHOD OF GRAVITY INTERPRETATION WITH REFLECTION SEISMICS AND GEOLOGICAL FINDINGS IN THE OFFENBURG AREA*. Geophysical Prospecting, 2 (1) 1-23 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1954.tb01276.x
 
and/or  
Mindat.org is an outreach project of the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization.
Copyright © mindat.org and the Hudson Institute of Mineralogy 1993-2025, except where stated. Most political location boundaries are © OpenStreetMap contributors. Mindat.org relies on the contributions of thousands of members and supporters. Founded in 2000 by Jolyon Ralph.
To cite: Ralph, J., Von Bargen, D., Martynov, P., Zhang, J., Que, X., Prabhu, A., Morrison, S. M., Li, W., Chen, W., & Ma, X. (2025). Mindat.org: The open access mineralogy database to accelerate data-intensive geoscience research. American Mineralogist, 110(6), 833–844. doi:10.2138/am-2024-9486.
Privacy Policy - Terms & Conditions - Contact Us / DMCA issues - Report a bug/vulnerability Current server date and time: August 21, 2025 11:07:42
Go to top of page